Aug. 16, 2017
Like a group of mopey pre-teens ordered to clean their messy rooms, the Wyoming State Legislature’s Revenue Committee met earlier this month in Thermopolis under orders to do what its members apparently hate most: figure out new forms of revenue to fund Wyoming public schools and ease the radical boom-and-bust cycle that afflicts the state.
And just like a group of mopey pre-teens, the committee as a whole did a crappy, half-hearted job—the legislative equivalent of cramming everything under their bed or into their closet. They passed motions to write a handful of drafts bills that, if approved by the full Legislature, would increase the tax burden on working- and middle-class Wyomingites while essentially sparing the richest residents in our state, who already pay the absolute lowest tax rates in America.
But, what’s more, the committee passed bills apparently under the assumption that they would fail—members continued to express disbelief that the Wyoming State Legislature would actually pass any new tax or tax increase bills during the upcoming budget session, despite the $250 million shortfall in education funding an already strained statewide budget.
Revenue Co-chairman Sen. Ray Peterson (R-Cowley) told the committee it should try to move all of the tax proposals they considered forward, and urged them to “hold your nose and vote aye” to create draft bills for further consideration. With two exceptions, the members did just that, even if they disagreed about a particular tax.
After one vote, where the “ayes” sounded more like vague sighs and reluctant mumbles, Peterson joked that the committee “shouldn’t be so enthusiastic.”
But, of course, Wyoming’s fiscal woes are no joke—not to anyone who cares about developing a diversified economy and educated workforce, maintaining a quality university, driving down well-paved roads and having the fire department show up when their house is burning down, or who receives any sort of public assistance, from mental health services to Meals On Wheels.
The one-man tax-killing crew
Department of Revenue staffers told the committee that, for instance, if they raise property taxes and both increase and expand the state’s sales tax, it would generate an estimated $230 million. Throw in proposed tax increases on beer, wine and spirits, and the state would be closing in on the $250 million annual education budget shortfall that we face as a result of slumped mineral tax revenues.
A variety of lobbyists and specialists weighed in during the two-day meeting, but all of the hours of testimony and deliberations may have been a gigantic waste of time due to one man who briefly offered his opinions.
Senate President, Sen. Eli Bebout (R-Riverton) wields a huge amount of power over the legislative agenda. He can take any bill on any subject, stick it in his desk drawer during the session, and it’s like the proposed law never existed—he did this several times last session. If Bebout doesn’t want to take all of the blame, he can assign any bill to a committee that he knows will definitely kill it.
Bebout hates almost all tax increases. Loathes them, in fact. He’s said repeatedly that none should even be considered until the Legislature cuts even more from education—on top of the $55 million they’ve already slashed over the past two years. Recently, Bebout told the Casper Star-Tribune that he would like to see an additional $200 million cut.
One step forward, two steps back
Bebout attends every Revenue Committee and School Finance Recalibration Committee meeting either by phone or in person, even though he serves on neither committee. Just like always, he repeated to lawmakers in Thermopolis the old conservative mantra: “We don’t have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.” This despite the demonstrable revenue drop over the past several years.
Almost as an aside, Bebout did mention a couple types of taxes he would support: a statewide lodging tax, which would be paid almost entirely by tourists; and a corporate income tax on businesses that gross more than $25 million a year, which would target big box stores like Wal-Mart.
A lodging tax and corporate income tax on big business are both things that Better Wyoming can get behind. Conveniently, however, the Revenue Committee is considering neither of these.
And, of course, Bebout wouldn’t be Bebout if he didn’t follow up those thoughts by recommending the legislature should repeal perhaps the one tax measure ever passed in Wyoming designed to benefit poor people instead of the rich: the state sales tax exemption on food.
“To me it should be on the table,” Bebout said. Of course, the oil and gas boss from Fremont County never has problems putting food on his own table.
Being the loyal energy industry representative he is, Bebout also said if the Legislature raises property taxes it should decrease the percentage at which minerals are valued for severance and ad valorem taxes, from 100 percent to 90 percent. He explained that would make the property tax hike “net neutral” for the mineral industry.
Of course, this would also make it a tax increase that doesn’t generate revenue for the state.
Income tax enters the discussion
Bebout has already decided he’s against both a personal and corporate income tax, so that probably won’t be happening while he’s Senate president. But the topic was not completely omitted from discussion in Thermopolis.
During testimony by Department of Revenue head Dan Noble, Rep. Cathy Connolly (D-Laramie) stopped the state economist and pressed him to go into detail about income tax.
Noble was giving the committee a history lesson about Tax Reform 2000, which was the last time anyone took an earnest look at fixing Wyoming’s tax structure. During testimony, he had attempted to gloss over the fact that the Tax Reform 2000 committee’s number one recommendation was establishing personal and corporate income taxes in Wyoming. The TRK group argued that the income taxes would stabilize and bring equity to Wyoming’s tax structure.
Noble simply mentioned that income taxes were “unpopular” among legislators at the time, and moved on.
But Connolly asked him to go back and talk a bit more about income tax, and to particularly address the state Constitutional amendment that would allow Wyoming residents to write off their sales and property tax in the event of an income tax being established.
Noble, who had been a young Department of Revenue staffer in 2000 assigned to crunch numbers for income tax models, admitted that, according to his calculations, the amendment made it so people who made less than $30,000 a year wouldn’t have seen any tax increase at all as a result of an income tax. In today’s dollars, that would be about $45,000 a year.
“It actually acted like what they refer to as a progressive tax,” Noble said. A “progressive” tax is one that affects wealthy people more than working- and middle-class people.
Maybe that’s why legislators, who are mostly rich themselves, didn’t like it then, and don’t today.