[one_half last=”no” spacing=”yes” center_content=”no” hide_on_mobile=”no” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_position=”left top” border_position=”all” border_size=”0px” border_color=”” border_style=”” padding=”” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”” animation_speed=”0.1″ class=”” id=””][fusion_text]January 13, 2017
Four bills that have failed in past sessions—two on guns, two on abortion—have once again been filed in the Wyoming House by far-right legislators hell-bent on doing whatever they can to avoid working on the actual problems facing the state.
Although the Legislature did creep to the right this past election, with defeats of both Democrats and moderate Republicans, these tired old proposals will likely once again limp to the legislative graveyard—but only after plenty sanctimonious chest thumping by their sponsors and, of course, wasting lawmakers’ time.
Abortion obsession
The same two lawmakers who sponsored them last year, Rep. Cheri Steinmetz (R-Lingle) and Rep. Scott Clem (R-Gillette), have resurrected a pair of pro-life bills that went nowhere last year. They didn’t make it for introduction in the budget session, and no one talked about them.
This is perhaps because there is only one clinic that performs abortions in the entire state, in Jackson. Women who live elsewhere use facilities in nearby states, where the overwhelmingly male Wyoming Legislature can’t make decisions about their reproductive rights (except by forcing them to drive long distances for an abortion).
Steinmetz is sponsoring HB 116, which is kind of a warped tribute to Planned Parenthood, since it’s aimed at preventing things that the family planning organization never did, such as sell aborted baby parts for profit. Vehement anti-abortion protesters, though, will swear that it’s true.[/fusion_text][/one_half][one_half last=”yes” spacing=”yes” center_content=”no” hide_on_mobile=”no” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_position=”left top” border_position=”all” border_size=”0px” border_color=”” border_style=”” padding=”” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”” animation_speed=”0.1″ class=”” id=””][fusion_text]
[/fusion_text][/one_half][three_fourth last=”yes” spacing=”yes” center_content=”no” hide_on_mobile=”no” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” background_position=”left top” border_position=”all” border_size=”0px” border_color=”” border_style=”” padding=”” margin_top=”” margin_bottom=”” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”” animation_speed=”0.1″ class=”” id=””][fusion_text]Steinmetz’s bill would make selling a viable fetus so its organs can be harvested a felony, punishable by a $10,000 fine and between one and 14 years in prison. It defines a “viable embryo or fetus” as one that can feel pain or could live outside the mother’s womb. Certainly this kind of baby-part selling is a widespread plague running rampant in the state that must be stopped by immediate legislative action.
An identical bill last year, also sponsored by Steinmetz, never even made it to the floor for a vote on whether it should be introduced.
The same fate befell a bill sponsored last year by Clem that would make the failure of a physician to report an abortion within 50 days a misdemeanor punishable by $1,000 fine, a year in prison, or both. The only change to last year’s failed bill is that the physician was only given 30 days to report an abortion.
Bills to strengthen abortion reporting requirements have been introduced since 2009, when a version failed to get out of a committee by a 6-2 vote. That bill would have fined a physician for not reporting in due time, but there was no jail time for a violation.
Clem and other Republicans now want a judicial hammer to get physicians to comply: jail doctors who don’t cooperate. Again, this bill would govern a total of perhaps two physicians in one clinic that performs abortions in the state. Clem could literally spend less time just calling to check in on them once a month, rather than trotting out his pet bill to perform its song and dance.
Gun bills set up Senate-House fight
In recent sessions pro-gun bills have been passed by the House and defeated in the Senate. Two similar bills will set up more confrontation between the two chambers over carrying concealed firearms in places where they are now prohibited.
Rep. Bo Biteman (R-Ranchester) sponsored both bills. Biteman won his seat by defeating incumbent Rep. Rosie Berger in last year’s GOP primary. Biteman attacked the moderate Berger for her allegedly agreeing too often with her liberal colleagues, including on gun issues. If Biteman had not defeated her, Berger was in line to become speaker of the House.
HB 136 would repeal gun-free zones on college campuses and universities. It would allow people with concealed weapon permits to carry concealed guns at the University of Wyoming and at each community college. Biteman’s other pro-gun bill, HB 137, would repeal gun-free zones at governmental meetings, including the Legislature, where all weapons are now banned.
Repealing gun-free zones have been controversial and ultimately unsuccessful in past sessions. In 2015 a version that would have allowed concealed carry at schools, college campuses, governmental meetings and the Legislature passed the House, 47-13. But the Senate defeated it 25-3.
Last year the House overwhelmingly passed a bill, 50-10, that would have allowed concealed-carry at governmental meetings. But the bill not only wasn’t discussed on the Senate floor, it was never even assigned to a committee.
Perhaps next year Biteman can propose a bill that allows weapons in the House chamber, but not the gun-hating Senate chamber, so when the terrorists attack he can run over and save those foolish liberal lawmakers like the hero he surely is. Or maybe it will dawn on the freshman representative that his Rambo fantasies don’t do much to improve people’s lives in Wyoming and he should focus on other things.[/fusion_text][/three_fourth]